About Presidential Audits
Presidential Audits is an independent civic-education project that evaluates U.S. presidents using evidence, transparent standards, and category-by-category scoring instead of partisan impressions.
The Purpose
The purpose of Presidential Audits is not to tell readers what to think. It is to make the basis of judgment clear. Each audit separates achievement, democratic strengthening, oath fulfillment, corruption, and democratic damage so readers can compare presidential records with more precision.
Presidents are often judged through loyalty, reputation, ideology, nostalgia, or anger. This project is built to slow that process down and ask clearer questions: What happened? What evidence supports it? Which category does it affect? How should it be weighed against the full record?
Who It Serves
Presidential Audits is designed for readers who want clearer civic judgment, better evidence habits, and more transparent ways to compare presidential records.
Citizens
Better tools for judging presidential records beyond slogans, party loyalty, personality, popularity, or single-issue impressions.
Students
Clear civic-learning materials that encourage evidence, context, category thinking, historical comparison, and critical reasoning.
Educators
Structured audit categories, scorecards, methodology notes, and discussion tools for history, civics, government, and media-literacy classes.
Journalists and Researchers
A transparent framework for comparing records, source notes, category judgments, revision history, and public accountability claims.
What Makes It Different
The project is built around separation, documentation, revision, and consistent standards.
Separate Categories
Achievement is not blended with corruption, democratic strengthening, oath fulfillment, or democratic harm. Each category answers a different question.
Transparent Scoring
Scores are tied to categories, evidence, explanations, and published methodology. They are guides into the audit, not replacements for it.
Revision Trail
Corrections, evidence updates, methodology clarifications, and score changes are tracked publicly so readers can see what changed and why.
Nonpartisan Standard
The same framework applies regardless of party, ideology, era, popularity, personal style, or whether a president is admired or disliked.
Independence Statement
Presidential Audits is not affiliated with any political party, campaign, government agency, or presidential library. The project is designed for civic education, public accountability, and better historical judgment.
Support, submissions, corrections, or public feedback do not buy influence over scores, conclusions, categories, methodology, or revision decisions.
Start Exploring
Begin with the methodology, compare scores, review individual audits, or support the project by sharing, submitting evidence, or helping build better civic-education tools.